Skip to start of page content

Lancashire County Council Logo | Listen | Home | A to Z | Feedback | Complaints | Your Council | Business | Residents | Visitors |

Lancashire Profile > Research Monitors Email us about this page     Printer-friendly version of this page

Home About Us Contact Us Links Newsletter Triplane to Typhoon What's New Lancashire Overview Area Profiles by Area Area Profiles by Subject Research Monitors Archive Business Activity Community Safety Earnings, Income and Benefits Economic Performance Education and Training Employment Environment Health and Wellbeing Housing and Households Industry Sectors Manufacturing Population Transport Unemployment Data Downloads Lancashire Focus Hot Topics 100-Year-Old Independent Lancashire Firms Deprivation Economic Intelligence Bulletin for NW England Small Area Profiles State of Lancashire Report Unemployment JSNA Health and Wellbeing

Condition of the Dwelling Stock in Lancashire

April 2008

Introduction

Information on the size of the dwelling stock and its condition in each local authority area is collected by the Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG) from the annual Housing Investment Programme "Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix" and the Housing Revenue Account Business Plan Statistical Appendix. The full dataset has dwelling stock numbers for 354 local authorities in England as at 1st April 2006, and covers 22,085,741dwellings. Unfortunately, for 17 of the authorities (including Chorley) there were no figures for unfit dwellings.

Local authorities use the results as the basis for action against unfit houses, to guide decisions on the declaration of renewal areas and for other purposes including the assessment of the condition of the housing stock.

The numbers have been obtained from the (External) Neighbourhood section of the (External) Office for National Statistics website . Selected details for the Lancashire authorities have been used in this article whilst the complete results for Lancashire authorities, including a back series of figures to 2001, have been placed in the Data Download Centre .

The Current Statutory Minimum Standard for Housing

Dwellings are deemed unfit if they fail to meet one or more of the following fitness criteria:

Table 1 Condition of the Dwelling Stock, April 2004-April 2006
 
Total Dwellings
Unfit Dwellings
No.
No.
%
2004
2005
2006
2004
2005
2006
2004
2005
2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
North Lancashire
210,099
210,862
212,052
9,809
11,388
11,396
4.7
5.4
5.4
Blackpool
67,667
67,904
68,257
4,242
4,753
4,753
7.0
7.0
7.0
Fylde
34,903
35,190
35,362
1,655
1,782
1,782
4.7
5.1
5.0
Lancaster
59,524
59,520
59,922
1,800
2,753
2,727
3.0
4.6
4.6
Wyre
48,005
48,248
48,511
2,112
2,100
2,134
4.4
4.4
4.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Central Lancashire (1)
192,767
194,184
196,442
8,421
8,812

4.4
4.5

Chorley (1)
43,556
44,035
44,524
1,715
1,677

3.9
3.8

Preston
57,775
57,733
58,691
2,994
3,407
3,100
5.2
5.9
5.3
South Ribble
45,211
45,804
46,250
1,688
1,687
1,678
3.7
3.7
3.6
West Lancashire
46,225
46,612
46,977
2,024
2,041
1,422
4.4
4.4
3.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lancashire West (1)
402,866
405,046
408,494
18,230
20,200

4.5
5.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
East Lancashire
226,776
227,519
228,965
49,433
29,465
29,419
21.8
13.0
12.8
Blackburn with Darwen
58,922
58,634
59,032
20,788
9,685
10,124
35.3
16.5
17.2
Burnley
40,383
40,177
40,289
9,320
3,460
3,247
23.1
8.6
8.1
Hyndburn
35,903
35,987
36,193
9,032
5,755
5,755
25.2
16.0
15.9
Pendle
38,047
38,972
39,135
6,862
6,783
6,515
18.0
17.4
16.6
Ribble Valley
23,946
24,225
24,355
1,289
1,055
1,055
5.4
4.4
4.3
Rossendale
29,575
29,524
29,961
2,142
2,727
2,723
7.2
9.2
9.1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lancashire County (1)
503,053
506,027
510,170
42,633
35,227
32,138
8.5
7.0

Lancashire NUTS-2 (1)
629,642
632,565
637,459
67,663
49,665
47,015
10.7
7.9

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
North West
3,023,470
3,043,323
3,059,208
183,283
164,739
158,679
6.1
5.4
5.2
England
21,723,001
21,906,172
22,085,741
1,034,496
962,588
922,183
4.8
4.4
4.2
Notes (1) The 2006 official figures do not contain an unfit dwelling total for Chorley. This means that it is not possible to derive accurate numbers or rates for Central Lancashire, Lancashire West, Lancashire County and Lancashire NUTS-2.
Source Department for Communities and Local Government - Dwelling Stock by Tenure and Condition, April 2004-April 2006

Lancashire Results

In 2006 there were an estimated 47,015 dwellings in the Lancashire NUTS-2 area sub-region (excluding Chorley) deemed to be statutorily unfit for habitation. At the local authority level, Blackburn with Darwen recorded the largest number of unfit dwellings (10,124), which represented 17.2% of the dwelling stock. In numeric terms, the number of unfit dwellings is far higher than any other Lancashire authority, but in percentage terms Pendle (16.6%) and Hyndburn (15.9%) recorded similar high rates.

In comparison to the England average of 4.2% of dwellings classified as unfit, only South Ribble (3.6%) and West Lancashire (3.0%) recorded rates in Lancashire that were lower the national average.

Nelson, Pendle District

Photograph of Nelson in Pendle

Comparisons with Other Local Authority Areas


The Role of Elevate in East Lancashire

To address the problem of sub-standard housing in East Lancashire and in other parts of the country, the government set up nine housing market renewal pathfinders charged with finding innovative solutions to the problem of low demand, negative equity, and housing market collapse. (External) Elevate East Lancashire is one of the nine pathfinders and covers the 5 authorities of Blackburn with Darwen, Burnley, Hyndburn, Pendle and Rossendale. Elevate has an ambitious programme to revitalise failing neighbourhoods and for more information please visit

In order to offer some appreciation of the scale of the problem of unfit dwellings in parts of Lancashire, percentage rates are ranked in Table 2 alongside other local housing authorities in England with high percentage rates. The table dramatically emphasises the poor position of much of East Lancashire with local districts occupying the top three places in the national ranking. Blackburn with Darwen is in top spot with Pendle and Hyndburn close behind.

Rossendale, Burnley and Blackpool are also ranked in the top 50, whilst Preston and Fylde are included in the top 100.

Table 2 District Ranking of Percentage of Unfit Dwellings, April 2006
Rank (1)
Area
% Unfit Dwellings
 
 
 
1
Blackburn with Darwen
17.2
2
Pendle
16.6
3
Hyndburn
15.9
4
Easington
15.8
5
Plymouth
12.8
6
Oldham
12.7
7
Brent
11.6
8
Newham
11.5
9
Dover
11.3
10
Derwentside
11.2
 
 
 
18
Rossendale
9.1
25
Burnley
8.1
36
Blackpool
7.0
68
Preston
5.3
80
Fylde
5.0
106
Lancaster
4.6
115
Wyre
4.4
121
Ribble Valley
4.3
160
South Ribble
3.6
206
West Lancashire
3.0

Chorley

Note (1) Ranking out of 354 local housing authorities in England
Source Department for Communities and Local Government - Dwelling Stock by Tenure and Condition, April 2006

Energy Efficiency

Demolition Work in the Bank Top Area of Blackburn

Photograph of demoloition work in the Bank Top area of Blackburn

The 2006 data set contains figures for calculating an energy rating using the government's Standard Assessment Procedure. It represents a measure of the overall energy efficiency of dwellings and is independent of both heat loss from the dwelling and the performance of the heating system. It ranges from 1 (highly inefficient) to 120 (highly efficient).

A total of 23 authorities had no recorded figures (including Blackpool), and a further two had results that were so at variance with the other 329 data sets that they have been discounted. Table 3 reveals that Preston, with a score of 59, is considered on average, to have the most energy efficient housing in Lancashire whilst Hyndburn, with a figure of 44, recorded the lowest figure in Lancashire and one of the lowest figures in England.

It is difficult from the data set to derive underlying reasons why particular areas recorded high or low figures. The affluence of an area or the type of housing stock do not appear to be factors that lead to identifiable variations between authorities. In Lancashire, Burnley and Ribble Valley recorded the same figures (51) yet from the points of view of overall wealth, housing type and price, the two authorities have little in common.

Table 3 District Ranking of Overall Energy Efficiency of Private Sector Housing, April 2006
Rank (1)
Area
Value (Range 1-120)
 
 
 
1
Surrey Heath
69
2
New Forest
68
3
Rotherham
65
 
 
 
22
Preston
59
94
South Ribble
54
140
Lancaster
52
160
Burnley
51
161
Ribble Valley
51
194
Blackburn with Darwen
50
217
Chorley
49
240
Fylde
48
241
Rossendale
48
242
West Lancashire
48
263
Pendle
47
264
Wyre
47
302
Hyndburn
44

Blackpool

 
 
 
327
Hastings
38
328
West Devon
37
329
Caradon
36
Note (1) Ranking out of 329 Local Housing Authorities in England. A total of 23 authorities had no recorded figures and two others had results that were so at variance with the other figures as to be considered misleading.
Source Department for Communities and Local Government - Dwelling Stock by Tenure and Condition, April 2006 Dwelling Stock by Tenure and Condition

This page was compiled by Bryan Moulding .

All enquiries from the media should be sent to Corporate.Communications@lancashire.gov.uk .

Any other questions about the content of this page may be sent to EconInfo@lancashire.gov.uk .

For all enquiries about the county council's services , contact the Customer Service Centre on 0845 0530000 (01772 530000) or at Enquiries@css.lancscc.gov.uk .

  Printer Friendly Version | About our website | Top of page | Office of the Chief Executive Copyright © 2009, Lancashire County Council | Site Terms (External) Tell us what you think about our site...

Change Text Only Settings

Graphic version of this page