Skip to start of page content

Lancashire County Council Logo | Listen | Home | A to Z | Feedback | Complaints | Your Council | Business | Residents | Visitors |

Lancashire Profile > Research Monitors Email us about this page     Printer-friendly version of this page

Home About Us Contact Us Links Newsletter Triplane to Typhoon What's New Lancashire Overview Area Profiles by Area Area Profiles by Subject Research Monitors Archive Business Activity Community Safety Earnings, Income and Benefits Economic Performance Education and Training Employment Environment Health and Wellbeing Housing and Households Industry Sectors Manufacturing Population Transport Unemployment Data Downloads Lancashire Focus Hot Topics 100-Year-Old Independent Lancashire Firms Deprivation Economic Intelligence Bulletin for NW England Small Area Profiles State of Lancashire Report Unemployment JSNA Health and Wellbeing

Journey to Work
2001

May 2004

Introduction

The daily journey-to-work movements of the great majority of the working population is a phenomenon of our age and is of considerable importance to the design and management of the transport system and to the location of development. It has major implications for the study and the planning of peak urban and inter-urban transport requirements and the locations of major land uses that generate the need for movement. Further, it is an important element in the consideration of the level and quality of employment opportunities available and in questions of industrial location policy. At the level of the individual, the daily commute journey can involve considerable psychological strain as well as the expenditure of time and money.

An ever-greater separation of home and workplace, promoted by economic and social factors and facilitated by increased levels of car ownership, has led, over the past half century to both a large increase in the number and length of work trips and to an increasingly complicated spatial pattern of work movements to move diverse locations. The major trips are centripetal - that is, flows towards the centres of towns from suburbs and outlying areas, but the detailed pattern in Lancashire is complicated both by the fact that many work centres lie within a short distance of one another and by the development of out of town and out of centre major employment areas. The result of such factors has been to create local work trip patterns of multifarious cross-flows and counter-flows of various volumes. Both the significance of external workflows to and from Lancashire and the wholly internal trips within the sub-region have increased substantially over recent decades.

For many people the daily commute is voluntary in order to take advantage of a better job or desirable home environment. For others it can be an expensive and lengthy necessity brought about by industrial restructuring and changing workplace patterns. For those willing and able to undertake such work journeys, the choices of work opportunities are greatly enhanced; for employers there is an ability to recruit from an enlarged potential workforce with a greater work-skills base.

Journey to Work in Lancashire

The nature and scale of journey to work movements in Lancashire can be gauged from the 2001 Census of Population Workplace and Transport to Work Statistics. Comparisons with previous Census reports enable trends over time to be established and identified. Table 1 shows the journey to work patterns for the Lancashire NUTS-2 area and its constituent areas.

Table 1 Journey to Work, Lancashire, 2001
 
Employed Residents
Resident & Working in Area
% Living & Working in Area
Residents Elsewhere & Working in Area (Commuters to Area)
Working Elsewhere & Resident in Area (Commuters from Area)
Net Movements
Total Working in Area
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NORTH LANCASHIRE
192,240




-4,920
187,320
Blackpool
59,070
41,710
70.6
17,610
17,360
250
59,320
Fylde
32,220
20,410
63.3
20,160
11,810
8,350
40,570
Lancaster
55,910
46,230
82.7
6,780
9,680
-2,900
53,010
Wyre
45,040
24,650
54.7
9,770
20,390
-10,620
34,420
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CENTRAL LANCASHIRE
205,570




-4,970
200,600
Chorley
49,200
24,140
49.1
12,440
25,060
-12,620
36,580
Preston
56,200
38,470
68.5
40,070
17,730
22,340
78,540
South Ribble
51,330
22,910
44.6
18,780
28,420
-9,640
41,690
West Lancashire
48,840
27,990
57.3
15,790
20,850
-5,060
43,780
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LANCASHIRE WEST
397,810




-9,890
387,920
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EAST LANCASHIRE
219,780




-11,490
208,290
Blackburn with Darwen
53,580
37,940
70.8
21,010
15,640
5,370
58,950
Burnley
38,100
25,140
66.0
13,110
12,960
150
38,250
Hyndburn
34,770
19,350
55.7
12,110
15,420
-3,310
31,460
Pendle
37,040
23,690
64.0
8,920
13,350
-4,430
32,610
Ribble Valley
26,410
14,090
53.4
10,000
12,320
-2,320
24,090
Rossendale
29,880
15,860
53.1
7,060
14,020
-6,960
22,920
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LANCASHIRE COUNTY
504,930
406,570
80.5
71,360
98,360
-27,000
477,930
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LANCASHIRE NUTS-2
617,590




-21,370
596,220
Source ONS 2001 Census of Population, Workplace & Transport to Work Statistics.

'Lives and works in area' includes people who work at or mainly from home and those with no fixed place of work.

Counts do not include people whose usual residence was outside England and Wales.

In 2001 Lancashire had more employed residents (617,600) than jobs within its boundaries (596,200). The balance is accounted for by net outward commuting (primarily to Greater Manchester and Merseyside work centres) amounting to 21,400.

The majority of Lancashire's employed residents continue to both live and work in the same district. In Lancaster this share rises to nearly 83% suggesting a fairly self-contained local labour market, but the proportion falls to just 45% in South Ribble where many residents have a high dependency on Preston for employment opportunities. Generally speaking the larger urban areas of Preston (with 69% both living and working in the district), Blackburn (71%), Blackpool (71%) and, to a lesser extent, Burnley (66%) tend to be more "self-contained" in terms of employed residents' working trips than districts elsewhere in the sub-region.

Net Movements

Districts may be classed into "job surplus" or "job deficit" areas referring to the balance in a district between its numbers of employed residents and its numbers of workplaces. This is a simple arithmetic division that fails to account for any differences in either the quality or the skills of the positions available or of the workforce and therefore should not be taken as a (direct) measure of self-sufficiency (Table 2).

Table 2 Journey to Work Net Movements, Lancashire, 1951-2001
 
1951
1961
1971
1981
1991
2001
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NORTH LANCASHIRE
-4,190
-5,930
-7,790
-5,200
-2,750
-4,920
Blackpool
-6,240
-6,730
-4,040
-4,060
1,020
250
Fylde
2,410
4,500
2,380
6,800
8,920
8,350
Lancaster
70
-220
220
-560
-2,100
-2,900
Wyre
-430
-3,580
-6,350
-7,380
-10,590
-10,620
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CENTRAL LANCASHIRE
3,590
1,010
-940
-2,610
-4,330
-4,970
Chorley
170
-2,030
-7,090
-10,780
-12,740
-12,620
Preston
3,830
9,950
18,090
24,340
22,900
22,340
South Ribble
3,030
700
-4,200
-8,410
-8,880
-9,630
West Lancashire
-3,440
-7,610
-7,740
-7,760
-5,610
-5,060
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LANCASHIRE WEST
-600
-4,920
-8,730
-7,810
-7,080
-9,890
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EAST LANCASHIRE
2,240
-3,320
-4,480
-8,360
-10,370
-11,490
Blackburn with Darwen
1,100
2,190
5,180
5,770
5,280
5,380
Burnley
-660
1,450
3,200
3,890
1,700
150
Hyndburn
-1,270
-3,360
-3,790
-6,150
-5,640
-3,310
Pendle
660
-240
-2,520
-2,870
-3,290
-4,430
Ribble Valley
-580
-1,620
-3,350
-3,730
-3,550
-2,310
Rossendale
-1,490
-1,740
-3,200
-5,270
-4,870
-6,970
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LANCASHIRE
-2,840
-8,240
-13,210
-16,170
-17,450
-21,370
Source ONS - Censuses of Population, Workplace & Transport to Work Statistics

In 2001 the same five districts as in 1991 had job surpluses, that is to say, they attracted more workers than they lost to other districts. These were Preston, Lancashire's largest single work centre with a net gain of 22,300 workers (2% less than in 1991) which it attracted from all parts of the sub-region and beyond; Fylde (+8,300 - a decrease of 6.4% since 1991), which benefited from the presence of a number of very large major employers such as BAE Systems, British Nuclear Fuels and the insurance company Axa; the two manufacturing centres of Blackburn (+5,400) and Burnley (+200), although Burnley's net inward flow has decreased by 91% since 1991; and Blackpool (+250), but again with a large reduction since 1991. At the opposite end of the spectrum, Chorley (with a net daily outflow of -12,600 commuters), Wyre (-10,600) and South Ribble (-9,600) experienced the largest district journey to work outflows, though in the first two cases the long-term pattern of ever greater net losses appear to have been contained over the past decade. Elsewhere, Rossendale's work loss of 7,000 represented an increase of 43% over the 1991-2001 decade, presumably reflecting its strengthening economic ties with work centres in Greater Manchester. The improved position of Ribble Valley (-2,300 net outward commuters in 2001 compared to -3,600 in 1991) is likely in part to represent the above-average rates of employment growth and new local business formation over the decade.

There has been a tendency for those districts that were net exporters in 1951 to continue exporting workers, with the exceptions of Burnley and Blackpool (who became net importers in 1961 and 1991 respectively); small inflows in 1951 in the districts of Lancaster, Chorley and Pendle have become net outflows over the period, significantly so for the Central Lancashire District of Chorley. Preston, Fylde and Blackburn districts have increased in importance as net attractors of workers over the period 1951-2001. South Ribble, with a net inward flow of workers in 1951 on a par with Preston, by 2001 had the third largest net outflow of any district.

Gross Movements

In 2001 Lancashire County had a net outward commuting of 27,000, as reflected on Table 1, though this disguises much larger gross flows to and from the area (Table 3). In the case of Preston, for example, in excess of 40,000 people commute to the district each day whilst 36,000 Preston residents commute outwards to other work centres. At the other extreme, the lowest gross flows are found in Lancaster.

Table 3 Journey to Work Gross Flows, Lancashire, 1991-2001
 
Commuters to Area
Commuters from Area
1991
2001
1991
2001
 
 
 
 
 
Blackburn with Darwen
16,880
21,010
11,600
15,640
Blackpool
16,230
17,610
15,210
17,360
Burnley
10,880
13,110
9,180
12,960
Chorley
8,880
12,440
21,620
25,060
Fylde
18,400
20,160
9,480
11,810
Hyndburn
7,170
12,110
12,810
15,420
Lancaster
4,190
6,780
6,290
9,680
Pendle
6,540
8,920
9,830
13,350
Preston
35,760
40,070
12,860
17,730
Ribble Valley
6,710
10,000
10,260
12,320
Rossendale
6,010
7,060
10,880
14,020
South Ribble
16,230
18,780
25,110
28,420
West Lancashire
12,830
15,790
18,440
20,850
Wyre
6,650
9,770
17,240
20,390
Source ONS - 2001 Census of Population

Viewed over the decade 1991-2001 virtually all districts have seen increases in gross flows. The largest increases in inward flows have been in Hyndburn (+69%) and Lancaster (+62%). Lancaster remains a fairly self-contained local labour market though over the last decade also registered a 54% increase in the number of commuters from the area.

Blackpool (+9%) and Fylde (+10%) together with Preston (+12%) are the districts that registered smaller changes in relation to commuters to the area, between 1991 and 2001.

In terms of outward flows, aside from Lancaster, the largest increases were experienced by Preston (+38%), Pendle (+36%) and Burnley (+35%) with West Lancashire, South Ribble and Blackpool recording much lower rates of increase.

Table 4 reveals the journey to work trends for the Lancashire during the 50-year period 1951-2001. There have been significant increases in commuters to and from the sub-region. The dependence upon external work centres has been a characteristic of increasing importance throughout the post-war period, with nearly eight times the net (outward) movement of workers from the County by 2001 compared with 1951.

Table 4 Journey to work trends, Lancashire, 1951-2001
 
Employed Residents
Resident & Working in Lancashire
Resident Elsewhere & Working in Lancashire (Commuters to Area)
Working Elsewhere & Resident in Lancashire (Commuters from Area)
Net Movements
Total Working in Lancashire
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1951
608,000
587,700
17,500
20,300
-2,800
605,200
1961
592,400
562,600
21,600
29,800
-8,200
584,200
1971
582,80
541,600
28,000
41,200
-13,200
569,600
1981
565,70
522,100
27,40
43,600
-16,200
549,500
1991
586,600
531,600
37,550
55,000
-17,450
569,150
2001
617,570



-21,370
596,200
Source ONS - Censuses of Population, Workplace & Transport to Work Statistics

This page was compiled by Bryan Moulding .

All enquiries from the media should be sent to Corporate.Communications@lancashire.gov.uk .

Any other questions about the content of this page may be sent to EconInfo@lancashire.gov.uk .

For all enquiries about the county council's services , contact the Customer Service Centre on 0845 0530000 (01772 530000) or at Enquiries@css.lancscc.gov.uk .

  Printer Friendly Version | About our website | Top of page | Office of the Chief Executive Copyright © 2009, Lancashire County Council | Site Terms (External) Tell us what you think about our site...

Change Text Only Settings

Graphic version of this page