Skip to start of page content

Lancashire County Council Logo | Listen | Home | A to Z | Feedback | Complaints | Your Council | Business | Residents | Visitors |

Lancashire Profile > Research Monitors Email us about this page     Printer-friendly version of this page

Home About Us Contact Us Links Newsletter Triplane to Typhoon What's New Lancashire Overview Area Profiles by Area Area Profiles by Subject Research Monitors Archive Business Activity Community Safety Earnings, Income and Benefits Economic Performance Education and Training Employment Environment Health and Wellbeing Housing and Households Industry Sectors Manufacturing Population Transport Unemployment Data Downloads Lancashire Focus Hot Topics 100-Year-Old Independent Lancashire Firms Deprivation Economic Intelligence Bulletin for NW England Small Area Profiles State of Lancashire Report Unemployment JSNA Health and Wellbeing

Low Birthweight Live Births
2006

November 2008


Summary

In 2006, Preston (11.2%) recorded the highest rate in the whole of England and Wales for low birthweight live births. In contrast, Ribble Valley recorded the lowest rate (2.9%) of all 374 local authorities in England and Wales.

The past six years reveal that Burnley and Blackburn with Darwen are also areas in Lancashire that consistently record high rates.

Introduction

The following article is based on datasets released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) via their (External) Neighbourhood Statistics website . These datasets contain counts of low birthweight live births occurring in each of the calendar years 1999 to 2006 in England and Wales to mothers usually resident in England and Wales. Information is provided for regions and local authorities/districts. Allocation to geographical area is based on mother's place of usual residence and not on the place where the births occurred although in the case of home births these may be the same. The information is useful for identifying geographic variations in health.

Background

Low birthweight live births are defined as those that weigh less than 2,500 grams at birth. This is the definition of used by the (External) World Health Organisation . Below this value birthweight specific infant mortality begins to rise rapidly. Birthweight is determined by two major processes: duration of gestation and intrauterine growth rate (IUGR). Low birthweight is caused by either a short gestation period or retarded intrauterine growth or a combination of both. The relationship between these processes and the outcome of low birthweight are complex: not all preterm births result in low birthweight babies, nor does IUGR directly correlate to birth weight.

It is clear however, that low birthweight live births do have a higher risk of death in the first year of life than babies of normal birthweight (i.e. 2,500g+). Furthermore, this is not the only consequence of low birthweight. It can also cast long shadows into adult health status with associations having been shown between low birthweight and adverse health in later childhood and adulthood, including deficits in growth, cognitive development, diabetes and heart disease.

In the current UK policy context, there is an emphasis on combating health inequalities at an inter-generational level and, as part of this process giving every child a healthy start in life is accorded a high priority. As low birthweight is a leading cause of infant mortality , preventing or ameliorating it is an important policy objective.

Lancashire Results

In simple numerical terms just over 1,495 low birthweight live births were recorded in the broader Lancashire area in 2006 (Table 1). This represented 22.8% of the North West Region total and 3.0% of those in England and Wales. By district, the number of low birthweight live births was greatest in Blackburn with Darwen (232) followed by Preston (212), whilst the lowest by far was in the predominantly rural district of Ribble Valley (14).

The data cover six years, a relatively short period to identify real trends but between 2001 and 2006 there was a noticeable increase of over 5,000 (11.2%) in the number of low birthweight babies in England and Wales, whilst in the broader Lancashire area the number rose by 9.8%. There were quite large variations between local districts. Four Lancashire authorities recorded decreases over the six-year period, whilst another four recorded increases of over 23%.

The research monitor archive section contains the earlier edition of this article that has figures for both 1999 and 2000.

Table 1 Number of Low Birthweight Live Births, 2001 to 2006 (1)
 
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
% change 2001-2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Burnley
98
94
109
115
138
115
17.3
Chorley
76
72
77
77
77
95
25.0
Fylde
41
41
32
30
50
46
12.2
Hyndburn
106
103
101
110
99
101
-4.7
Lancaster
86
89
107
91
95
93
8.1
Pendle
110
90
115
99
121
113
2.7
Preston
170
150
169
155
191
212
24.7
Ribble Valley
29
32
37
31
28
14
-51.7
Rossendale
58
57
56
58
60
57
-1.7
South Ribble
88
77
78
77
88
102
15.9
West Lancashire
88
85
75
85
69
80
-9.1
Wyre
71
73
73
76
84
88
23.9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lancashire County
1,021
963
1,029
1,004
1,100
1,116
9.3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Blackburn with Darwen
222
249
248
239
221
232
4.5
Blackpool
106
115
150
150
114
147
38.7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lancashire NUTS-2
1,349
1,102
1,427
1,393
1,435
1,495
9.8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
North West
5,965
6,060
6,374
6,283
6,351
6,566
10.1
England and Wales
45,059
45,962
47,522
48,574
48,335
50,121
11.2
Note (1) Live birthweight of less than 2,500g
Source ONS - Low Birthweight Live Births

The published data, as outlined in Table 1 above, give the number of live births of low birthweight in an area but these on their own do not facilitate useful comparisons between areas due to differences in the size of resident populations and in the total numbers of live births occurring in one area as compared with another. For such a comparison to take place, the number of low birthweight live births has been expressed as a percentage of all live births in each area.

In 2006, babies born weighing less than 2,500g accounted for 7.6% of all live births in England and Wales, a rate that has been fairly stable over recent years. Unfortunately, the data do not contain any Lancashire rates, but at the local authority level a rather mixed and in some instances a quite disturbing results are evident. This can best be illustrated by ranking each district in terms of its low birthweight rate out of the 374 local district areas throughout England and Wales. On this basis, in 2006, Preston recorded the highest rate (11.2%) in England and Wales, whilst Blackburn with Darwen (10.0%) was in eighth place and Burnley (9.8%) was in eleventh worst position. In total, 10 of the 14 Lancashire local authorities recorded rates below the national average.

The very low number recorded in Ribble Valley led to a rate of just 2.9% and a ranking of 374th position. This meant that in 2006, Lancashire contained the districts with the highest and lowest rankings in the whole of England and Wales.

The rankings in 2001 and all the yearly totals in Table 2 reveal some noticeable shifts, but in general terms, authorities such as Burnley, Preston and Blackburn with Darwen have experienced consistently high rates.

Table 2 Live Births under 2,500 g as a Percentage of All Live Births, 2001 to 2006
 
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Rank (1)
2001
2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Burnley
9.3
9.0
10.0
10.0
11.9
9.8
24
11
Chorley
7.5
7.0
7.0
6.2
6.6
7.9
138
94
Fylde
6.5
7.2
5.6
5.0
7.6
8.0
258
86
Hyndburn
10.4
10.1
8.9
10.0
8.8
9.0
5
28
Lancaster
6.8
7.3
8.1
6.9
6.8
6.7
209
237
Pendle
10.2
8.5
10.3
8.5
9.7
9.2
7
20
Preston
10.3
9.6
10.0
8.8
10.6
11.2
6
1
Ribble Valley
5.8
6.6
7.3
5.9
5.9
2.9
314
374
Rossendale
7.6
8.0
7.9
7.1
7.5
6.8
129
225
South Ribble
7.9
7.3
7.1
6.4
7.9
8.6
97
43
West Lancashire
7.8
8.0
6.6
7.2
5.8
7.0
98
199
Wyre
7.7
8.2
7.4
7.5
9.0
8.6
118
44
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Blackburn with Darwen
10.7
11.8
11.6
10.9
9.7
10.0
3
8
Blackpool
7.6
8.2
9.7
8.9
6.9
8.9
128
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
North West
7.9
8.1
8.2
7.7
7.8
7.8


England and Wales
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.5
7.6


Note (1) District ranked out of the 374 unitary/district authorities in England and Wales (1=poorest out-turn)
Source ONS - Low Birthweight Live Births
Figure 1 Live Births under 2,500 g, 2006

Map showing the number of underweight births and the underweight births as a percentage of all live births for Lancashire's local authorities - see text for details Source ONS - Low Birthweight Live Births

The prevalence of low birthweight is known to vary by a wide range of factors including mother's age and general well-being, multiplicity, ethnicity and/or country of birth, smoking, nutrition, socio-economic position and a range of deprivation issues in general. Consequently, all these factors may contribute to the geographical variations noted above. It is beyond the scope of this article to offer detailed explanations or to seek to establish the relative importance of different factors. Suffice to say that analysis across a wide range of key social and economic indicators such as those relating to wages and incomes, housing conditions and measures of deprivation reveal the significant problems that continue to face many areas within Lancashire. It is therefore not wholly surprising that such difficulties are also reflected in relatively high rates of low birthweight babies in several districts.

This page was compiled by Bryan Moulding .

All enquiries from the media should be sent to Corporate.Communications@lancashire.gov.uk .

Any other questions about the content of this page may be sent to EconInfo@lancashire.gov.uk .

For all enquiries about the county council's services , contact the Customer Service Centre on 0845 0530000 (01772 530000) or at Enquiries@css.lancscc.gov.uk .

  Printer Friendly Version | About our website | Top of page | Office of the Chief Executive Copyright © 2009, Lancashire County Council | Site Terms (External) Tell us what you think about our site...

Change Text Only Settings

Graphic version of this page