Skip to start of page content

Lancashire County Council Logo | Listen | Home | A to Z | Feedback | Complaints | Your Council | Business | Residents | Visitors |

Lancashire Profile > Research Monitors Email us about this page     Printer-friendly version of this page

Home About Us Contact Us Links Newsletter Triplane to Typhoon What's New Lancashire Overview Area Profiles by Area Area Profiles by Subject Research Monitors Archive Business Activity Community Safety Earnings, Income and Benefits Economic Performance Education and Training Employment Environment Health and Wellbeing Housing and Households Industry Sectors Manufacturing Population Transport Unemployment Data Downloads Lancashire Focus Hot Topics 100-Year-Old Independent Lancashire Firms Deprivation Economic Intelligence Bulletin for NW England Small Area Profiles State of Lancashire Report Unemployment JSNA Health and Wellbeing

Personal Incomes
2005/2006

March 2008

Introduction

HM Revenue and Customs tax offices hold information on persons who could be liable to pay UK tax. A sample survey is carried out annually and covers the income assessable for tax in each tax year.

Unlike the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) (see the Average Earnings and Hours of Work research monitor ), which is based on a 1% sample of employees in employment, and provides information on gross weekly earnings of full-time and part-time employees on adult rates, the survey of personal incomes includes both employees (including occupational pension recipients with a PAYE record) and the self-employed. It broadly includes all individuals whose income is higher than the prevailing personal tax allowance and who are therefore liable to tax. The results are gathered by place of residence, whilst the ASHE figures are available by both workplace and place of residence. Commuter flows can result in major differences between work-based and residence-based figures for some districts.

Table 1 includes mean and median value personal income figures for Lancashire authorities, the North West and UK. The median is the value below which 50% of employees are allocated and is more reflective of the 'typical' wage or income. It is preferred over the mean for earnings data as it is influenced less by extreme values and because of the skewed distribution of earnings data. The complimentary ASHE results place the emphasis on the median (middle value) to replaces the mean (average value) as the headline statistic.

The approximate national sample size for 2005-06 is 540,000, and the cases have been grossed up to forecast the number of people in each area that will eventually file 2005/06 tax returns and pay the tax due. This particular research monitor examines the results for the Lancashire area, but full details for all areas of the UK for the 2005/06 financial year, can be downloaded from the (External) HM Revenue and Customs Personal Incomes website . Our Data Download Centre contains details of the Lancashire figures from 2003/2004, and earlier editions of this research monitor are in the Archive .

Table 1 Personal Income, 2005/2006
 
Number of Individuals
Mean Income before Tax (£)
Median Income before Tax (£)
 
 
 
 
Burnley
43,000
18,100
14.500
Chorley
58,000
22,800
17,800
Fylde
41,000
30,000
17,800
Hyndburn
44,000
18,000
15,400
Lancaster
69,000
20,600
16,000
Pendle
35,000
19,400
13,700
Preston
63,000
20,500
16,000
Ribble Valley
30,000
27,800
18,200
Rossendale
35,000
21,800
15,700
South Ribble
59,000
21,100
16,300
West Lancashire
56,000
23,500
16,600
Wyre
54,000
20,700
14,700
 
 
 
 
Lancashire County (NUTS-3)
586,000
21,800
16,000
 
 
 
 
Blackburn with Darwen
68,000
18,700
14,500
Blackpool
63,000
16,800
14,000
 
 
 
 
North West
3,360,000
21,700
16,100
United Kingdom
31,100,000
24,300
17,100
Source HM Revenue & Customs
Note The district figures are subject to random error caused by sampling and, where the sample size is small, estimates for a geographical area can be subject to large sampling errors.

Lancashire Results

Estimated total personal incomes in Lancashire County and its constituent districts, together with Blackburn with Darwen and Blackpool unitary authorities for the financial year 2005/06, are shown in Table 1. The estimates given in the table for the districts are based on small numbers and as such are subject to sampling errors.

The personal incomes data reveal that the median or "typical" personal income in the Lancashire County of £16,000 is estimated at 94% of the UK average in 2005/06. In comparison, the mean is estimated to be much higher at £21,800, but is only 90% of the UK average. Table 1 reveals that the mean figures are in each case noticeably higher than the median results. This is because they are significantly influenced by a relatively small numbers of high earners and offer a somewhat distorted viewpoint of what would be a typical personal income. The median values give a better picture of the typical income levels.

Overall, in terms of "median" personal incomes, Lancashire County is ranked a lowly joint 30th with Northumberland, Shropshire and the West Midlands, out of the 40 English shire and metropolitan counties in 2005/06, in a range that extended from £22,100 per annum in Surrey to £14,100 in Cornwall & the Isles of Scilly. On the basis of "mean" personal incomes, the county was ranked in joint 28th position within a much broader range of incomes spanning from £36,400 in Surrey to £18,800 in Cornwall.

The 2001 Census figures revealed a positive net daily outflow of over 20,000 more people commuting to jobs outside the county than coming into the area for work . Personal incomes in Lancashire are therefore to some extent underpinned by people commuting to better work opportunities in Liverpool and Manchester.

District and Unitary Authority Results

In the case of the twelve Lancashire districts and the two unitary authorities, the median results reveal that the typical income is highest in Ribble Valley (£18,200), followed by Chorley and Fylde (both with £17,800).

High 'mean' income districts may be characterised by the local presence of generally high wage local companies/industries. They can also be underpinned by positive outward commuting flows, presumably reflecting the desire of many higher income earners to work in larger urban or metropolitan areas whilst enjoying the perceived benefits of a more "rural" or small town life style.

Fylde and Ribble Valley were the two Lancashire districts that recorded mean figures higher than the UK average. Both Fylde and Ribble Valley benefit from being attractive rural locations that are popular with commuters. In addition, the local BAe systems factories at both Warton and Salmesbury provide thousands well-paid job opportunities.

Pendle recorded the lowest median income in Lancashire (£13,700), whilst the neighbouring district of Burnley had the lowest 'mean' figure in Lancashire with £18,100.

The 2005/06 edition of this article presents for the first time a breakdown of the results for employees, the self-employed and pension income (Tables 2-4). The three tables have average figures that are well below the overall averages in Table 1. The exclusion of investment income (in Table 1 but not the other three) is part of the reason. Some people will supplement occupational pension income whilst continuing to work, whilst there may be other factors such as welfare benefits to working people that could impact on the results.

The three tables together highlight the following points:

Table 2 Self-Employment Income, 2005/2006
 
Number of Individuals
Mean Income before Tax (£)
Median Income before Tax (£)
 
 
 
 
Burnley
3,000
15,500
9,680
Chorley
6,000
18,100
9,850
Fylde
5,000
24,100
11,300
Hyndburn
4,000
15,000
7,370
Lancaster
8,000
15,600
9,590
Pendle
5,000
16,600
9,750
Preston
6,000
18,000
8,290
Ribble Valley
5,000
18,000
7,130
Rossendale
5,000
17,300
8,750
South Ribble
7,000
14,800
8,340
West Lancashire
7,000
18,800
9,900
Wyre
7,000
17,700
10,100
 
 
 
 
Lancashire County (NUTS-3)
68,000
17,500
9,450
 
 
 
 
Blackburn with Darwen
7,000
15,200
7,780
Blackpool
9,000
11,900
7,750
 
 
 
 
North West
360,000
18,300
9,640
United Kingdom (1)
3,800,000
20,500
10,300
Source HM Revenue & Customs
Note The district figures are subject to random error caused by sampling and, where the sample size is small, estimates for a geographical area can be subject to large sampling errors.
(1) Central confidence limit estimate
Table 3 Employees in Employment Income, 2005/2006
 
Number of Individuals
Mean Income before Tax (£)
Median Income before Tax (£)
 
 
 
 
Burnley
34,000
17,300
14,800
Chorley
47,000
21,200
17,700
Fylde
27,000
23,800
16,700
Hyndburn
38,000
17,000
14,500
Lancaster
54,000
18,800
15,400
Pendle
27,000
18,000
14,400
Preston
51,000
19,100
15,400
Ribble Valley
21,000
24,200
17,600
Rossendale
27,000
19,800
15,700
South Ribble
45,000
20,400
16,600
West Lancashire
44,000
20,700
16,300
Wyre
38,000
18,700
14,100
 
 
 
 
Lancashire County (NUTS-3)
453,000
19,700
15,700
 
 
 
 
Blackburn with Darwen
55,000
17,600
14,400
Blackpool
47,000
15,800
13,700
 
 
 
 
North West
2,630,000
20,100
15,900
United Kingdom (1)
23,900,000
22,500
16,900
Source HM Revenue & Customs
Note The district figures are subject to random error caused by sampling and, where the sample size is small, estimates for a geographical area can be subject to large sampling errors.
(1) Central confidence limit estimate
Table 4 Pension Income, 2005/2006
 
Number of Individuals
Mean Income before Tax (£)
Median Income before Tax (£)
 
 
 
 
Burnley
9,000
8,910
8,580
Chorley
11,000
11,100
9,800
Fylde
14,000
12,800
9,950
Hyndburn
7,000
8,880
8,190
Lancaster
14,000
10,600
9,150
Pendle
7,000
8,810
7,550
Preston
11,000
10,700
9,950
Ribble Valley
9,000
12,400
9,910
Rossendale
6,000
10,200
9,010
South Ribble
13,000
9,960
8,210
West Lancashire
12,000
11,100
9,680
Wyre
16,000
10,700
8,840
 
 
 
 
Lancashire County (NUTS-3)
128,000
10,700
8,940
 
 
 
 
Blackburn with Darwen
13,000
10,200
8,850
Blackpool
13,000
9,160
8,330
 
 
 
 
North West
715,000
10,900
9,080
United Kingdom (1)
6,590,000
11,600
9,300
Source HM Revenue & Customs
Note The district figures are subject to random error caused by sampling and, where the sample size is small, estimates for a geographical area can be subject to large sampling errors.
(1) Central confidence limit estimate Personal Incomes by Tax Year

This page was compiled by Bryan Moulding .

All enquiries from the media should be sent to Corporate.Communications@lancashire.gov.uk .

Any other questions about the content of this page may be sent to EconInfo@lancashire.gov.uk .

For all enquiries about the county council's services , contact the Customer Service Centre on 0845 0530000 (01772 530000) or at Enquiries@css.lancscc.gov.uk .

  Printer Friendly Version | About our website | Top of page | Office of the Chief Executive Copyright © 2009, Lancashire County Council | Site Terms (External) Tell us what you think about our site...

Change Text Only Settings

Graphic version of this page