Skip to start of page content

Lancashire County Council Logo | Listen | Home | A to Z | Feedback | Complaints | Your Council | Business | Residents | Visitors |

Lancashire Profile > Research Monitors Email us about this page     Printer-friendly version of this page

Home About Us Contact Us Links Newsletter Triplane to Typhoon What's New Lancashire Overview Area Profiles by Area Area Profiles by Subject Research Monitors Archive Business Activity Community Safety Earnings, Income and Benefits Economic Performance Education and Training Employment Environment Health and Wellbeing Housing and Households Industry Sectors Manufacturing Population Transport Unemployment Data Downloads Lancashire Focus Hot Topics 100-Year-Old Independent Lancashire Firms Deprivation Economic Intelligence Bulletin for NW England Small Area Profiles State of Lancashire Report Unemployment JSNA Health and Wellbeing

River and Bathing Water Results in Lancashire
2005

October 2006, updated June 2007

Glasson Marina

Photograph of Glasson Marina

The article uses information derived from the (External) Environment Agency's website which can be found by going to the section for the (External) North West Region . The information is presented in two tables and covers Waterways and Bathing water quality.

Table 1 highlights the percentages of Good, Fair, Poor or Bad waterways in Lancashire Districts, 2005, as assessed by the Environment Agency chemistry General Quality Assessment (GQA). Total waterways per District vary dramatically across the authority from just 0.2 kilometres in Blackpool (lowest in the North West) to over 200 km in the rural Ribble Valley district.

In total, Table 1 has details for 1,131.3 kilometres of waterways in the 14 Lancashire authorities, which represents 20.8% of the North West total.

For the North West as a whole in 2005, 92% of rivers were of good or fair chemical quality, which means that they have low levels of organic pollution and adequate levels of oxygen.

All six East Lancashire authorities of Blackburn with Darwen, Burnley, Hyndburn, Pendle, Ribble Valley and Rossendale only contained rivers in the Good or Fair chemical quality standard, whilst the tiny river length for Blackpool also achieved the same standard. The percentage of Lancashire rivers achieving the 'Good' standard was however low in comparison to the North West average of 62.6%. Only Ribble Valley District with 88.4%, and Lancaster with 71.7% (the two authorities with by far the longest stretches of rivers) were above the regional average.

Table 1 Quality of Waterways by Lancashire District, 2005
 
Percentage of Waterways Classed as...
Total Length of Waterways (km)
Good
Fair
Poor
Bad
 
 
 
 
 
 
Burnley
55.6
44.4
0.0
0.0
49.1
Chorley
33.1
60.6
6.4
0.0
97.5
Fylde
0.0
82.1
17.9
0.0
33.9
Hyndburn
48.7
51.3
0.0
0.0
40.1
Lancaster
71.7
25.2
3.1
0.0
195.9
Pendle
41.4
58.6
0.0
0.0
63.1
Preston
27.2
66.4
6.5
0.0
69.1
Ribble Valley
88.4
11.6
0.0
0.0
200.3
Rossendale
54.2
45.8
0.0
0.0
45.3
South Ribble
16.2
60.9
18.2
4.7
42.1
West Lancashire
27.4
54.7
17.9
0.0
144.9
Wyre
46.2
43.6
10.2
0.0
104.9
 
 
 
 
 
 
Blackburn with Darwen UA
26.6
73.4
0.0
0.0
44.9
Blackpool UA
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
North West
62.6
29.4
6.5
1.5
5,428.0
Source Environment Agency Bridge over the River Ribble at Ribchester

Photograph of the bridge over the River Ribble at Ribchester

Of the six authorities that recorded poor river quality results, four recorded rates higher than the North West average of 6.5%. Although South Ribble recoded the highest percentage in Lancashire (18.2%), the rate for West Lancashire (17.9%) was based on a much longer river length of 144.9 km.

South Ribble District was the only Lancashire authority to have a proportion of its river length classified under the 'Bad' water heading (4.7%). This represented just under 2 kilometres of rivers in the authority and equates to around 0.18% of all Lancashire rivers. The North West percentage of bad river quality (1.5%) is underpinned by some particularly high rates in Knowsley (32.9%), Wirral (25.3%), Barrow-in-Furness (14.4%) and Warrington (14.6%).

The Source of Pollution

Many human activities and their by-products have the potential to pollute water. Large and small industrial enterprises, the water industry, the urban infrastructure, agriculture, horticulture, transport, discharges from abandoned mines, and deliberate or accidental pollution incidents all affect water quality. Pollution may arise at point source, such as discharges through pipes, or may be more dispersed and diffuse. Both sources may be exacerbated by adverse weather conditions.

Bathing Water

The Environment Agency states that it samples North West beaches approximately 20 times per week between May and September, to assess the performance against bacteriological standards laid down in the EC Bathing Water Directive.

The North West coast is bounded by the Irish Sea. Although relatively small (it has only about 6% of the volume of the North Sea), the Irish Sea receives significant inputs of contaminants from direct discharges along its coasts, and from diffuse agricultural and urban sources. Through a multi-million pound European funding stream, the Environment Agency has worked with international partners to improve coastal and recreational waters.

Until recently, discharges from wastewater treatment works and combined sewer overflows were the primary source of bacteriological pollution for most of the North West's bathing waters. Improvements to how sewage is treated and moved around the region have helped to reduce these sources of contamination. Nowadays, pollution from diffuse sources such as run-off from agricultural land and run-off from urban areas are still a problem, particularly in wet weather.

Table 2 Bathing Water Quality at Lancashire Beaches, 1993-2006
 
2006
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
St Annes Pier
 
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
St Annes North
 
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Blackpool South
 
 
 

tick: compliant with Guideline Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Blackpool Central
No result (1)
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Blackpool North
 
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Bispham
 

tick: compliant with Guideline Standard

tick: compliant with Guideline Standard

tick: compliant with Guideline Standard
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Cleveleys
 
 
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Fleetwood
 

tick: compliant with Guideline Standard
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Heysham Half Moon Bay
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
 
Morecambe South
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
 
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Morecambe North
 
 
 
 
 
 

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard

cross: non-compliant with Imperative Standard
Notes

tick: compliant with Guideline Standard=compliant with Guideline Standard, =non-compliant with Imperative Standard
blank=compliant with Imperative Standard but non-compliant with Guideline Standard
(1) Blackpool Central Beach closed 2005 for major engineering works on the sea wall and promenade.
Source Environment Agency
Middleton

Photograph of Middleton

Lancashire Results

In recent years there has been a significant improvement in the quality of the North West Region's bathing waters. In 2006, all of the 36 bathing waters sampled in the North West complied with the European mandatory standards. This is the first time that a 100% pass rate has been achieved since compliance began in 1998. Nine beaches (25%) passed the much more stringent 'guideline' standard but unfortunately none of the 10 Lancashire beaches sampled achieved this standard. This is disappointing since Bispham and Fleetwood had achieved this standard over the past few years, however it is good to note that Morecambe South in 2006 managed to achieved the mandatory standard.

For the region as a whole, the 25% result is well below the 50% target figure for the more stringent standard.' Bathing water quality will therefore have to improve considerably for the region to achieve the standards proposed in the revised (External) Bathing Water Directive .

This page was compiled by Bryan Moulding .

However, it is now archived and is based on old data . Go to the current page to see analysis of the latest data.

All enquiries from the media should be sent to Corporate.Communications@lancashire.gov.uk .

Any other questions about the content of this page may be sent to EconInfo@lancashire.gov.uk .

For all enquiries about the county council's services , contact the Customer Service Centre on 0845 0530000 (01772 530000) or at Enquiries@css.lancscc.gov.uk .

  Printer Friendly Version | About our website | Top of page | Office of the Chief Executive Copyright © 2009, Lancashire County Council | Site Terms (External) Tell us what you think about our site...

Change Text Only Settings

Graphic version of this page